Trade
External trade with the USA, 2017 – Jan 2026
The annual table and flow chart give the clearest executive view of turnover, exports, imports, and the bilateral balance. Keep methodology notes visible when comparing against U.S. Census or Comtrade.
Growth in flows is useful, but the priority conversation is export diversification, market access, and converting forums into product-level opportunities.
Technical charts are preserved for analysts and researchers in the Advanced Trade Analysis section rather than removed from the dashboard.
| Indicator | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Growth vs 2017 | Growth vs 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover | 395.8 | 701.5 | 603.9 | 275 | 426.3 | 436.8 | 765.1 | 1,024.9 | 1,004 | 2.5× | -2.0% |
| Exports | 78.1 | 132.4 | 36.6 | 26.7 | 60.8 | 68.5 | 253.1 | 430.7 | 291.7 | 3.7× | -32.3% |
| Imports | 317.7 | 569 | 567.2 | 248.3 | 365.5 | 368.7 | 512 | 594.1 | 712.2 | 2.2× | +19.9% |
| Balance | −239.6 | −436.6 | −530.6 | −221.6 | −304.7 | −299.7 | −258.9 | −163.3 | −420.5 | 1.8× | -157.5% |
The annual table is the quote-safe backbone for turnover, exports, imports, and balance.
It gives officials a consistent headline series and prevents accidental mixing with U.S. reporter-side data.
Use this for external annual statements, then cite methodology notes when comparing against Census or Comtrade.
USD millions, State Statistics Committee of Uzbekistan.
The methodology comparison is preserved, but deferred so the executive trade page can render before Recharts hydrates. Open it when you need the UZ Stat and U.S. Census series side by side.
UZ Stat, U.S. Census, and Comtrade can describe the same flow differently.
Mirror gaps are not necessarily errors; they can indicate valuation, timing, reporter, or classification differences.
Use this chart when an analyst or policymaker asks why two public sources do not match.
Methodology matters.UZ-side and US-side trade figures describe the same flows but use different valuation, timing, and partner-country rules. Always label which series you're quoting in a briefing.
Per-series breakdown · 5 sources
- Uzbekistan National Statistics[A] input_trade_stat_docx
- Basis
- State Statistics Committee — UZ-reported exports, imports, turnover, balance, and partner share.
- Use for
- Briefings to UZ leadership; comparison against the national foreign-trade base; product/services structure.
- Caveat
- Partner-country totals should be labeled separately from the U.S. Census goods-only totals.
- U.S. Census goods-only totals[B] census_goods_uz
- Basis
- Official U.S. merchandise trade balance table.
- Use for
- U.S. goods exports, imports, balance, and 2026 monthly monitoring.
- Caveat
- Excludes services. Can differ from Uzbekistan-reported turnover because of valuation, timing, and partner-country methodology.
- USTR goods-and-services summary[B] ustr_uzbekistan
- Basis
- U.S. trade-policy country summary.
- Use for
- Total bilateral trade including services and policy briefing language.
- Caveat
- Not a substitute for monthly merchandise monitoring; services are annual and methodology-specific.
- Government Portal forum indicators[B] govuz_business_forum_2025
- Basis
- Official forum narrative and headline metrics (e.g. June 2025 forum reported $881.7M trade for 2024).
- Use for
- Investment climate, enterprise count, forum participation, leadership talking points.
- Caveat
- Forum turnover figure is not the same series as either the U.S. Census or the National Statistics series.
- BEA — services trade with Uzbekistan[B] bea_developers
- Basis
- U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis services-trade tables; underlying source for the USTR $603M 2024 services figure.
- Use for
- Authoritative anchor for U.S.–UZ services exports/imports when quoting beyond goods-only data.
- Caveat
- Annual cadence only; revisions can land 6–12 months after the reference year.
What this means: this chart is the fastest visual view of direction, volatility, and whether UZ exports are keeping pace with imports from the United States. It is loaded on demand to keep the first mobile paint light.
The line view reveals direction and volatility across the full 2017-2025 relationship.
It quickly shows whether exports, imports, and turnover are moving together or diverging.
Use for executive briefings before drilling into monthly and product tables.
Monthly U.S. Census data shows near-term trade pulse and seasonal movement.
It is useful for monitoring recent changes, but it should not replace the quote-ready annual UZ Stat view.
Use as a monitoring chart and keep annual methodology visible for external claims.
USD values, U.S. Census reporter-side goods series.
The structure charts identify which categories carry the bilateral goods relationship.
They connect policy conversations to concrete product lanes and market-entry questions.
Use to choose where HS/Comtrade or ITC analysis should go deeper.
The structure charts identify which categories carry the bilateral goods relationship.
They connect policy conversations to concrete product lanes and market-entry questions.
Use to choose where HS/Comtrade or ITC analysis should go deeper.
| # | Category | Share | Value, $M |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fuels and electricity | Share 8.6% | 25.1 |
| 2 | Food products | Share 3.3% | 9.5 |
| 3 | Non-ferrous metals | Share 3.3% | 7.8 |
| 4 | Mechanical equipment | Share 1.6% | 4.5 |
| 5 | Textile products | Share 0.7% | 2.1 |
| 6 | Grains and milling products | Share 0.5% | 1.4 |
| 7 | Base metals (non-precious) | Share 0.4% | 1.1 |
| 8 | Construction materials | Share 0.2% | 0.4 |
| 9 | Chemicals | Share 0.2% | 0.4 |
| 10 | Plastics | Share 0.1% | 0.3 |
The ranked tables make the biggest export and import categories easy to quote and compare.
They prevent the trade page from becoming only a time-series dashboard.
Use the rank tables for meeting notes, then open advanced analysis for HS-level precision.
| # | Category | Share | Value, $M |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vehicles and parts | Share 32.1% | 228.8 |
| 2 | Mechanical equipment | Share 17.0% | 121.0 |
| 3 | Electrical equipment | Share 9.3% | 65.9 |
| 4 | Pharmaceutical products | Share 7.6% | 54.4 |
| 5 | Food products | Share 3.6% | 25.5 |
| 6 | Optical instruments | Share 2.2% | 15.5 |
| 7 | Textile products | Share 1.0% | 7.1 |
| 8 | Chemicals | Share 1.0% | 7.0 |
| 9 | Wood and articles | Share 1.0% | 6.9 |
| 10 | Ferrous metals | Share 0.9% | 6.4 |
The ranked tables make the biggest export and import categories easy to quote and compare.
They prevent the trade page from becoming only a time-series dashboard.
Use the rank tables for meeting notes, then open advanced analysis for HS-level precision.